There are a few things to consider when selecting an electronic reviewer. Each reviewer will receive a structured electronic format template. The template includes a step-by-step guide for organizing the review. It will also provide information about the conflict of interests of the electronic reviewer. A well-structured, electronic review is crucial for a quality application.
Structured electronic templates
The Structured Electronic Reviewer Template was created to help reviewers organize their reviews. This template helps reviewers concentrate on the key findings and points. It also indicates revisions needed for publication and possible changes. It also lists any referee questions that may be relevant to the article. To provide feedback on manuscripts submitted, reviewers can use the template.
In August 2010, the journal was first introduced with the Structured Electronic Reviewer Template. More than 80 reviews were performed since the introduction of this new process. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of the structured electronic reviewer template on manuscript reviews.
Conflicts of Interest for Electronic Reviewers
Reviewers who are electronic should be aware that there may be a conflict of interest and report it to the journal. A conflict of interest is when a reviewer has an interest that could interfere with his or her ability to conduct a fair and objective evaluation of the work. Relevant commercial relationships include research funding, grants, research materials, and in-kind services.
Conflicts of interest can arise from reviewers' personal and business relationships. These conflicts can be caused by personal relationships, intellectual passion, or academic competition.